Options In Focus: Splitting Options
In Wednesday’s report this column touched upon IBD 100 stock Research In Motion (). Observations on somewhat high implieds levels after its earnings release were offered. One catalyst not mentioned, but also potentially affecting the pricing of the longer-term options is the company’s announcement of a 3-for-1 stock split payable on August 20.
While many traders are familiar with the splitting of shares, many more haven’t been involved with the process as it relates to having positions in the options. In the following two-part series, I’d like to touch upon some of the basics and try to clear up some possible anxieties related to the process.
The most common and easiest to understand is the 2-for-1 stock split. As with a position in the underlying stock, an option position will double. At the same time the premium or contract price and strike involved, will both be halved. For instance, if a position consists of +3 XYZ July 45 Calls at 1.10 on the eve of the split, the next morning when pulling up the account, we should find that in its place we have +6 XYZ July 22.50 Calls at 0.55.
If one is unsure of the math, just remember that the aggregate value of the ‘new’ position must match the value of what was previously in the account. In this instance both (3 x 1.10) and (6 x .055) result in $330 in premium. If this wasn’t the case, investors should notify their broker and the Options Clearing Corp.
A 3-for-1 split, which is what will occur in RIMM, is another common split type. Because of its denominator of 1, this too makes for mostly easy math. For illustration purposes lets look at what +4 September 200 Puts at 9.90 would look like, were RIMM’s ex-split to occur tomorrow. The new position would consist of +12 Sept 66.67 Puts for 3.30. Again, by multiplying we can confirm that the same aggregate value is in our account and that Santa’s Elves have done a good job overnight while traders rest.
How about, a bit more of a complicated split involving a dreaded “non-one” denominator? Let’s look at Brookfield Asset Management (), which early last month did a 3-for-2 split. First, investors might have an easier time by realizing that this ratio is the same as 1.5-for-1 and figuring the math that way. That in of itself, though, may be seen as presenting a problem. Now our ratio maintains a non-whole number. The question of how are we going to split our existing contracts might seem like a dilemma. For instance, if a position consisted of +3 Calls pre-split, will we now have +4.5 Calls in our account? In Friday’s conclusion we’ll move through the answer to this “odd” split problem.
Visit the «www.investors.com» for an extensive list of option-related terms.
The observations provided are not investment advice or a recommendation, the suitability of which is considered the responsibility of the trader.
Copyright 2007 through Optionetics, Inc. All rights reserved. «www.optionetics.com?source=ibdweb» is a Trademark or a registered Trademark of Optionetics, Inc., in the United States and/or in other countries.